Managed Security vs. Traditional IT Security: What’s Perfect?

With the rise in the sophistication and persistence of cyber threats, companies of every size are reevaluating their security policies to protect their networks, information, and clients. Organizations are faced with two options: either developing their own internal defense or managed cybersecurity services

The knowledge of managed security vs traditional IT security differences may assist leaders in deciding the strategy that fits them best with their operational objectives, risk-taking, and budget.

What Is Traditional IT Security?

Traditional IT security is an in-house methodology whereby the internal IT department of the company handles the protection of systems and data. 

The common duties of an internal security team are:

  • Setting up and supporting firewalls.
  • Antivirus and endpoint administration.
  • Carrying out software updates and patches.
  • Monitoring logs and alerts
  • Reaction to incidents that occur.

To protect against threats, organizations construct their own protection since there is a simpler threat environment and the technology is more manageable. 

What Is Managed Security?

Managed security vs traditional IT security transfers the liability to an expert third-party, which is called a Managed Security Service Provider(MSSP). 

Managed services regularly contain:

  • SOC-based 24/7 security surveillance.
  • Real-time live threat detection and response
  • Vulnerability testing and correction.
  • Configuration management patching
  • Patch and configuration management
  • Configuration management patching
  • Support and reporting compliance.

Cyber Husky is one such firm, providing custom security services, which constitute a combination of technology, experience, and 24/7 monitoring that enables businesses to concentrate on their main business and not on threats and security all the time.

Cost Comparison

The initial IT security solutions comparison may reveal that an internal team might appear cheaper to build. What is actually spent is, however, the salaries, benefits, continual training, certifications, and investment in tools and infrastructure.

In conventional security, the costs normally involve:

  • Security staff salaries.
  • Certifications and training.
  • Buys of hardware and software.
  • Licensing and maintenance charges.
  • Recovery costs for unexpected incidents.

Managed security services tend to be based on subscription. This is a foreseeable fee that is monthly or annually, including tools, monitoring, and professional-level support. 

Expertise and Resources

Cybersecurity is a field that demands expertise. The threat actors are constantly evolving new strategies, and it is difficult to keep the general IT personnel up to date.

Conventional IT departments might not be well versed in such aspects as:

  • Intelligence analysis of threats.
  • Digital forensics
  • Advanced malware detection
  • Containment and recovery of the incident.

Managed security providers have groups of specialists who possess various levels of skills. Organizations such as Cyber Husky will be demonstrating this model by providing customized security packages that integrate technology, experience, and 24/7 monitoring.

Response Time and Threat Mitigation

In traditional IT security, it is possible that the monitoring can be conducted only during business hours. In case employees are occupied with other activities, they may miss or delay alerts. Such a lag may provide attackers with precious lateral movement or data-stealing time.

Managed security providers enhance the response time by providing:

  • Continuous, 24/7 monitoring
  • Priority of alert automation.
  • Specialized incident response units.
  • Containment measures that can be taken immediately.

Earlier identification and elimination of risks cut down on downtimes, financial costs, and reputational losses. This 24/7 coverage may be a real gain to businesses that are operating around the clock or do not conform to the regular working hours.

Scalability and Flexibility

When doing an IT security solutions comparison, it is important to note that there are new users, new devices, new cloud services, and new places that add complexity.

The expansion of conventional IT security can even mean the recruitment of new employees and investment in new equipment. 

Managed security services would provide more flexibility as they allow organizations to:

  • Add and delete services at a rapid pace.
  • Monitoring scale with business development.
  • Integrate a hybrid environment and cloud.
  • Adjust to the evolving level of risks.

This flexibility guarantees that security is in line with business needs without huge capital investments.

Compliance and Reporting 

97% of organizations consider cybersecurity of high importance. In-house departments might not be able to replicate in-depth documentation when they are busy performing their daily activities. Lack of documentation may result in fines or an unsuccessful audit.

Managed security providers ease compliance by providing:

  • Automated reporting and logging.
  • Periodic security reviews.
  • Documentation for audits
  • Instructions on regulatory standards.

This is an organized process that assists organizations in delivering requirements with reduced pressure and errors.

In Conclusion 

The issue of managing security or traditional IT security is always a question of an organization’s size, budget, and risk profile. Conventional in-house solutions have the advantage of direct control, yet may overwork resources and restrict expertise. Managed security is able to provide expert know-how, 24/7 monitoring, and scalability, which is usually at a more predictable price.